Diving into the Depths of AI and Data Protection: A Legal Perspective
AI and GDPR: Preserving Personal Data Privacy in an Algorithmic Age
In today's fast-paced world, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seeped into every corner, from healthcare and finance to marketing and recruitment. However, this surge in AI use begs the question: are privacy and personal data protection being given their due? The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a European standard that commands global respect, plays a pivotal role in ensuring AI-based technologies align with individuals' fundamental rights.
In a world where algorithms process mammoth amounts of information at lightning speed, striking a balance between progress and legal adherence is paramount. How can companies employ AI without stepping on GDPR's toes? What powers do data subjects hold when their information is being processed?
Processing personal data through AI must rest on a solid legal foundation, as dictated by Article 6 of Regulation 679/2016. This foundation could be explicit consent, legitimate interest, or the fulfilment of a contract. For instance, if an AI system is utilized to tailor marketing content, the user must be fully informed about the use of their data and give explicit consent.
When training AI models, sensitive data, such as health information, ethnic origin, or political opinions, must be used only with a solid legal basis, as stipulated by Article 9 of GDPR. Data anonymization is crucial to minimize risks, especially when a company develops a facial recognition model using images from a public database that includes personal identifiers. In such cases, the company must anonymize the data or secure individuals' consent.
Businesses employing AI must perform Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA), as outlined by Article 35 of GDPR, and implement robust security measures to safeguard personal data. Algorithm auditing is essential to detect potential errors that could result in discriminatory outcomes.
AI also poses challenges regarding respecting the rights of data subjects as stated in Articles 15-21 of GDPR. Data subjects must be privy to clear information on how their data is processed and be able to request the elimination of their data from AI systems. Additionally, automated decisions with weighty implications, such as credit denial, necessitate human intervention to guarantee fairness.
GDPR compliance imposes additional costs on AI technology development. These costs include the design of systems that minimize data collection (Privacy by Default) and the integration of data protection from the initial design phase (Privacy by Design). Companies must document and demonstrate compliance with GDPR, requiring them to develop functionalities that collect only essential data for their objectives.
In the practical realm, numerous companies have encountered penalties for misusing AI systems, such as the use of biometric data for facial recognition, which is classified as unacceptable risk under AI regulations. Real-time biometric surveillance in public spaces is forbidden as it can significantly impact individuals' fundamental rights and freedoms. Evaluating citizens' behavior to assign a social score that influences their access to various public or private services can also provoke controversy.
Hence, the "Artificial Intelligence Act" (AI Act) serves as an extension of GDPR by instating clear rules for AI utilization within the EU. The AI Act categorizes AI applications according to risk levels and mandates stringent requirements for "high-risk" systems, like facial recognition used by authorities, AI systems in healthcare, or automated recruitment systems. These systems must adhere to both GDPR and AI Act requirements.
For additional queries or further insights, please don't hesitate to contact us at [email protected].
*This is Partner Content.
(Photo source: 141985125 | Data Protection © Wit Olszewski | Dreamstime.com)
- In the realm of AI, ensuring that the use of artificial-intelligence aligns with individuals' fundamental rights requires a solid legal foundation, as outlined in Article 6 of Regulation 679/2016, such as explicit consent, legitimate interest, or the fulfillment of a contract.
- When training AI models, the processing of sensitive data, including health information, ethnic origin, or political opinions, must be done with a solid legal basis, as stipulated by Article 9 of GDPR, to minimize risks and uphold privacy and personal data protection.
