Skip to content

Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Key Decision: Stay Private or Go Public

Going public boosts visibility and liquidity, but adds operational burdens. Staying private maintains flexibility, but limits access to capital markets.

On the right at the top corner there is coin on an object and there are texts written on the...
On the right at the top corner there is coin on an object and there are texts written on the object.

Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Key Decision: Stay Private or Go Public

Companies holding Bitcoin as a reserve, known as Bitcoin treasury companies, face a crucial decision: stay private or go public. This choice significantly impacts their capital access, shareholder alignment, and long-term competitiveness.

Going public offers several advantages. It increases visibility to institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, and strategic partners, allowing these companies to lead the conversation around corporate Bitcoin adoption. In favorable markets, public Bitcoin treasury companies have historically traded at premiums relative to their Bitcoin holdings, enabling accretive equity issuance.

However, going public also introduces complexities like SEC reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, increasing operational burden but professionalising treasury operations for long-term growth. Moreover, it can attract activist pressure if Bitcoin strategy execution misaligns with shareholder expectations, requiring robust governance structures.

For companies committed to a Bitcoin treasury strategy, going public is a force multiplier. It enables strategic compounding of Bitcoin reserves, attracts Bitcoin-aligned institutional shareholders, and enhances flexibility to navigate future macroeconomic and capital market shifts. It also provides liquidity opportunities for founders, employees, and early investors, strengthening talent recruitment and retention.

In summary, for Bitcoin treasury companies, going public can provide increased liquidity, broader access to capital markets, enhanced visibility and credibility, and the opportunity for diversified investor participation. However, it also introduces operational complexities and potential activist pressure. Understanding these differences is crucial for companies positioning themselves for the next stage of growth.

Read also:

Latest