Skip to content
GizmodoSportsTechFutureTechnology

Boeing Reaches Agreement with Department of Justice to Evade Criminal Accusations Regarding 737 Max Aircraft Disasters

The organization is set to dish out a minimum of $1.5 billion.

Boeing Reaches Agreement with Department of Justice to Evade Criminal Accusations Regarding 737 Max Aircraft Disasters

Boeing, DOJ Reach $1.1 Billion Settlement Over 737 Max Safety Concerns

In a recent development, Boeing and the Department of Justice have agreed on a settlement worth $1.1 billion to prevent the aircraft manufacturer from facing criminal charges. The alleged misleading of regulators about safety features on the 737 Max planes, following two crashes that took the lives of 346 people, is the crux of the issue.

According to a court filing, Boeing will pay out the aforementioned amount, with $487.2 million marked as a criminal monetary penalty and $455 million designated for strengthening the company's compliance, safety, and quality programs. Apart from these payments, the company promises to enhance its anti-fraud compliance and ethics program to prevent any future misconduct.

The Department of Justice also mandates Boeing's Board of Directors to meet with the families of the victims to hear their experiences and their thoughts on the company's compliance, safety, and quality programs.

While this settlement does result in more money being available for the families of the victims, it falls short of the outcome some families had anticipated. Paul Cassell, an attorney representing some of the families, stated earlier this week that "Boeing being held accountable to the flying public" is more crucial than the proposed fine and restitution to the victims' families.

The families had voiced their objections to a potential plea deal for some time now. When the DOJ first aimed to finalize an agreement last year, Cassell had described Boeing as receiving "sweetheart" treatment. Mark Lindquist, another attorney representing victim families, had expressed similar sentiments, stating that the deal failed to acknowledge that the charged crime of Conspiracy to Defraud caused the deaths of 346 people.

The settlement, seemingly on the verge of being finalized, offers more money than the original agreement but still falls short of what some families had seemingly hoped for. A spokesperson for the Department of Justice told the Associated Press that "nothing will diminish the victims' losses, but this resolution holds Boeing financially accountable, provides finality and compensation for the families, and makes an impact for the safety of future air travelers."

The case against Boeing stemmed from the company's alleged attempts to conceal potential safety concerns with its 737 Max aircraft during the Federal Aviation Administration's certification process. The company is accused of failing to disclose that its software system, the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), could turn the plane's nose down without pilot input based on sensor data. This resulted in two separate flights going nose down, and the pilots were unable to regain control, ultimately causing the planes to crash.

Boeing had previously settled with the Department of Justice over the 737 Max crashes, agreeing to pay $2.5 billion to avoid prosecution. However, the company violated the terms of that settlement, which exposed it to potential charges again.

  1. In the near future, Boeing may invest significantly in improving its compliance, safety, and quality programs in response to the settlement, aiming to strengthen its anti-fraud compliance and ethics program to prevent any future tech-related misconduct.
  2. Gizmodo might publish an article discussing the latest development in the Boeing case, focusing on the questionable technology used in the 737 Max planes, its impact on the tragedies, and the role it played in the subsequent investigations and settlements.
  3. The sports world could soon witness a debate on the ethics of corporations, as the Boeing case raises concerns about corporate responsibility, accountability, and the public's trust in technology companies, paralleling discussions around player behavior and fair play in sports.

Read also:

    Latest