Democrats Propose the 'BAD DOGE Act' to Dismantle Elon Musk's Establishment
Sure thing, here's your rewritten article:
Last night, California Congressman Dave Min brought a fresh proposal to the table, dubbed the Bolstering America’s Democracy and Demanding Oversight and Government Ethics Act, or simply known as the "BAD DOGE Act." This new legislation aims to reign in Elon Musk as he wields an increasingly prominent role in government affairs.
The BAD DOGE Act is one of two legislative initiatives that emerged within the past 24 hours. Its counterpart, the Legislative Enforcement Against Setbacks from Harmful DOGE Actions Act, or LEASH DOGE Act, was introduced by Rep. Suhas Subramanyam of Virginia. Both bills can be read in their entirety on the respective congressional representatives' websites.
The BAD DOGE Act takes a more assertive stance against Musk's involvement in government matters. It calls for an outright repeal of the Executive Order that established the department and critiques the appointment process of Musk as USDS Administrator. In doing so, the Act alleges that Musk lacks the required government records and compliance with disclosure and conflict-of-interest requirements.
While the White House maintains that Musk is not an employee of the department and cannot make official decisions, his influence within the agency is undeniable. He frequently shares updates on government operations through his Twitter account, and his presence has left many individuals and organizations worried.
Congressman Min expressed his concerns about the situation in a statement on his official website, emphasizing that many organizations, including UC Irvine, which he represents, are facing potential funding cuts. Min fears that these cuts could jeopardize the existence of these organizations and affect crucial projects, such as cancer trials and research projects, which rely on promised funding.
As of now, the BAD DOGE Act has garnered support from four Democratic co-sponsors, while the LEASH DOGE Act boasts a larger coalition of 12 Democratic co-sponsors. The LEASH DOGE Act seeks a comprehensive report on DOGE’s activities instead of pushing for a full repeal. This report would examine the potential long-term financial, public health, and safety implications of DOGE’s actions, as well as assess whether or not they have breached U.S. privacy laws.
In conclusion, the BAD DOGE Act and LEASH DOGE Act represent two novel legislative initiatives aiming to rein in Elon Musk's influence in government operations. While the BAD DOGE Act seeks a complete repeal of the Executive Order, the LEASH DOGE Act requests a thorough investigation into DOGE's actions and impact on government operations. Only time will reveal how these efforts unfold in the days and weeks ahead.
- The 'tech' industry is closely watching the developments surrounding the BAD DOGE Act and LEASH DOGE Act, as they could significantly impact future regulations in government-tech collaborations.
- Critics of Elon Musk argue that his role as USDS Administrator, as highlighted in the BAD DOGE Act, has potentially violated 'technology' and 'legislation' norms, due to his lack of required government records and compliance with disclosure requirements.
- Despite Musk claiming he's not an employee of the department, his 'influence' over government operations through social media platforms like Twitter has raised concerns, as mentioned in the statement by Congressman Min who cited potential funding cuts for organizations in his district.
- The 'future' of crypto-related government projects could be influenced by the outcome of these acts, with the LEASH DOGE Act calling for an investigation into DOGE's activities, potentially impacting 'usd' and 'crypto' markets.
