Federal Executive Mansion | Surveillance Drone Operations in New Jersey for Presumed Experimental Reasons
Redefining Anxiety: Drones and the Perilous Use of 'Research'
Always be cautious when you hear the term "research." This seemingly innocent word can provide legal cover for atrocities inflicted upon citizens by the United States government.
The White House's Statement on Aerial Machinations in New Jersey
The word "research" attached to these flying invaders in New Jersey isn't a beacon of positivity. Let me explain:
Consider the HAARP antenna array. It's capable of causing earthquakes, manipulating weather, and creating storms, and the US government justifies their assaults on humanity by concealing behind the word "research." If it's part of research purposes, the US government can legally commit murder with no repercussions. Notice the name: HAARP = High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program.
Here's the military's legal justification employed for HAARP.
MILITARY LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR SANCTIONED MURDER THROUGH "RESEARCH"Title 50, chapter 32, subsections 1520 a & b of United States Code (law) state:
(b) EXCEPTIONS:
the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experimentpeaceful purposeresearch
As long as they categorize their barbaric acts as a, "...peaceful purpose pertaining to research activity," they have a legal license to do whatever they wish. Hence, the term "research" cloaking HAARP weaponry.
In terms of "peaceful activity," the military designates preemptive attack, war, as well as population control agendas as "peaceful activities."
Now that the White House employs the term "research" in conjunction with the aerial machinations in New Jersey, the government has legal leeway (in their eyes) to employ these flying devices for abhorrent purposes if they so choose.
They've engineered drones in China capable of dispersing poisons such as fentanyl over populations for instance. The US could disseminate substances like this from drones for "research" purposes and escape accountability for poisoning the citizens below.
I'm not suggesting this is what they're accomplishing, but don't dismiss the reasoning presented by the White House as simple research using drones. It legally could be the contrary now they've utilized the term "research."
Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/white-house-clarifies-dronegate-new-jersey-drones-authorized-faa-research-purposes
Related:
Truth11 Films | Wireless Extermination | Microwave Radiation as Part of the Population Decimation Agenda | Transcript
Insights: The legal justification for the US government to potentially use drones for harmful purposes under the guise of "research" stems from a combination of statutory authority, executive orders, and policies designed to safeguard national security, protect critical infrastructure, and foster domestic drone industry innovation.
Key Legal Foundations: The authorities originating from statutes permit certain federal agencies to engage in advanced drone detection and mitigation activities, usually forbidden by federal and state laws concerning aircraft piracy, interception of electronic communications, and computer fraud and abuse. Two recent executive orders encourage a strong homegrown drone sector and secure the supply chain, while also addressing drone threats to public safety and national security. The government's use of drones in the military context falls under their right to protect national security and critical infrastructure, often involving research activities aimed at developing counter-drone technologies and weaponized drones within controlled environments.
Using "Research" as a Legal Veil: "Research" serves as a justification because it frequently encompasses controlled testing, development, and assessment of drone capabilities or countermeasures, which inform policy and defense strategies. Because research activities are essential for innovation and national security, they provide the government a legal basis to conduct drone operations, potentially harmful in nature, as long as such activities comply with applicable laws and oversight mechanisms.
- The use of 'research' by the White House in relation to the aerial machinations in New Jersey raises concerns about potential harmful purposes for drones, as under US Code, activities deemed 'peaceful' for research purposes can bypass legal restrictions.
- The legal framework, composed of statutory authority, executive orders, and policies, enables the US government to engage in advanced drone detection and mitigation activities, which, though often prohibited by other laws, are justified under the guise of 'research'.
- In the context of drone technology and data-and-cloud-computing, 'research' remains a powerful legal veil, providing the government with a justification for potentially harmful drone operations, as long as such activities adhere to applicable laws and oversight mechanisms.
