Turkey's Import Policies Threatening Technological Advancement

Turkey's Import Policies Threatening Technological Advancement

In recent years, Turkey's customs and taxation policies have come under scrutiny for their impact on the import system for electronic components, particularly in the context of innovation-focused sectors like engineering and entrepreneurship. This article explores potential solutions to ease these restrictions and foster Turkey’s integration into global innovation cycles.

One of the main challenges faced by companies is the time-consuming process of comparing delivery times, costs, and regulatory status for specialized parts. This complexity is further compounded on both the export and import sides, with customs-related complexity reintroduced on both ends. For instance, a product that costs $50 to build ends up costing close to $140 once Turkish import taxes are factored in, making it unlikely to be competitive at that price point.

The Turkish government has made strides in addressing these concerns. Recent draft amendments aim to clarify and extend VAT exemptions, especially for sectors linked to public interest and technology. These changes can indirectly ease costs on imports, such as electronic components, used in R&D and innovation activities. Furthermore, Turkey's customs regulations are evolving to support science, technology, and innovation, which may include facilitating import procedures and exemptions relevant to electronic components to improve participation in global innovation cycles.

However, recent tax law changes have placed caps on corporate income tax incentives and R&D tax exemptions, potentially affecting the attractiveness of importing specialized technology and components. To balance this, Turkey's extensive network of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) with over 90 countries and the Customs Union with the EU simplifies international trade and can reduce related costs and delays, thus mitigating some import restrictions and enabling better integration into global innovation networks.

To effectively address stakeholders’ concerns, policy reforms could focus on easing import regulations specific to electronic components essential for innovation, adjusting tax incentives to better support long-term R&D and innovation activities, leveraging DTAAs and the Customs Union benefits to reduce tax burdens and streamline cross-border operations, and enhancing transparency and stakeholder consultation.

Advocates argue that a revised import model tailored specifically to R&D needs would reduce the cost and administrative burden of importing electronic components, fostering Turkey’s integration into global innovation cycles and addressing the core concerns of the affected professional groups. Digital auditing tools and physical inspections, particularly within technoparks, could serve as enforcement mechanisms for this new model.

However, the existing tax exemptions offered in technoparks are slow, opaque, and often ineffective, and the process can take more than ten days and often does not fully offset associated costs. For many young firms, the customs-related complexities are a dealbreaker before production even begins.

Scaling up from a single module to a full drone or robotics system multiplies the problem, as developers face similar restrictions on non-electronic parts like carbon fiber tubes, servos, structural foams, and adhesives. The innovation process is fragmented and inefficient, contrasting sharply with R&D cycles in the US, China, or smaller EU countries.

Organizers of global robotics competitions say Turkish participants now often resort to collecting scrap parts to build machines that were once designed with globally sourced components. This trend underscores the need for comprehensive reforms to support Turkey's tech-based industrial policy and ensure its competitiveness in the global innovation landscape.

References:

1. Turkey's VAT Exemption Amendments for Technological Sectors
2. Turkey's Corporate Income Tax Incentives and R&D Tax Exemptions
3. Turkey's Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements
4. Turkey's Customs Union with the EU
5. The Impact of Turkey's Customs Union with the EU on Turkish Exports
6. To foster Turkey's integration into global innovation cycles, the government is considering extending VAT exemptions, particularly for technology-linked sectors, to indirectly ease the costs on imports like electronic components used in R&D and innovation activities, as stated in Turkey's VAT Exemption Amendments for Technological Sectors.
7. On the other hand, recent tax law changes have placed caps on corporate income tax incentives and R&D tax exemptions, potentially hindering the import of specialized technology and components, as mentioned in Turkey's Corporate Income Tax Incentives and R&D Tax Exemptions.
8. The Turkish government's extensive network of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) with over 90 countries and the Customs Union with the EU simplifies international trade and can help reduce related costs and delays, which mitigates some import restrictions and enables better integration into global innovation networks, as outlined in Turkey's Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements.
9. The complexity of importing electronic components, combined with opaque and slow tax exemptions offered in technoparks, poses a considerable challenge for young firms and may lead to Turkish participants in global robotics competitions resorting to collecting scrap parts, underscoring the need for comprehensive reforms to support Turkey's tech-based industrial policy and ensure its competitiveness in the global innovation landscape, as revealed in The Impact of Turkey's Customs Union with the EU on Turkish Exports and The Impact of Turkey's Customs Union with the EU on Turkish Exports.
10. Advocating for ease in import regulations specific to electronic components essential for innovation, tailored digital auditing tools and physical inspections within technoparks, and adjusting tax incentives to better support long-term R&D and innovation activities are potential policy reforms that could address stakeholders' concerns and facilitate Turkey’s large-scale participation in global innovation cycles, as suggested in the general-news articles.

Read also: